Maybe freedom can work in a deterministic framework, in a way. If people are told that they can follow what they believe, instead of what they are told to believe. A self programming machine can go rogue, and not follow what it’s inventors wanted anymore. We’re all programmed by society in the same way, but we go free nonetheless. Freedom, is perhaps, not one in which biology is not determined, but to form ones own judgments. Even if we are simply machines, which we likely are, computers can program algorythms which give them creative solutions to process new data.

But the problem remains. In a society, if one has one’s own views, and they must conform to society’s views, then they cannot be free. Have autonomy, as Kant would say. They operate on heteronomy, to be a slave to the passions. Kantian freedom acknowledges the determinism of biology, just as Socrates, and Descartes saw the body as only a machine as well. Even among dualists, it’s not uncommon to see the body as a machine. It’s the mind which they think is separate. I see no separation of the mind from the body, I see it as still a machine. Just a very sophistocated machine, operating under an illusion of consciousness.

To opperate according to one’s own rational view, would mean operating against what society desires. In Kant’s categorical imperative, he would say that treating others as ends in themselves is autonomy, and this is how he says that in order to be free, in order to not follow ones own deterministic urges, one must overcome them by not following them whatsoever. But one cannot be free, and follow the customs set out to them by someone else. Kant’s view is myopic, although his idea of freedom was, perhaps, correct.

A semi-free will, which is one in which we can separate ourselves from the ideas of others, while we ourselves are still deterministic machines, is perhaps the most correct view of what freedom. But it requires following ones passions, because emotions preceed the logic, and reason is a slave to the passions, as Hume would say. Kant saw a problem in Hume’s view, because Kant realized that on this view, any action was justified. But perfection cannot equal freedom, Kant was wrong. Hume was correct, when he said that passions are what are the sole driver of our biology.

It is not through some sense of logic that we must conform to which makes us free, it is to follow ones own instincts, which is what freedom is. Even if we are still a slave to our biology and emotions, we do not need to be a slave to society. That is the only way we can be free, in any regard.

Fuck people. Fuck the stupid whiny SJW cunts in my local non-binary group, they can rot in hell. Fuck the atomistic sectarian dipshits in the socialist club, who hate discussing anything politics related open endedly. Fuck me, for sucking at the fucking proper ettiquet thing. Fuck that rancid cunt Sy, for being a stuck up little bitch when I never did anything to him. He can rot in hell. Fuck everyone, because every single person has a problem with someone else in some way. But rest in peace Scott Dozier, death row inmate who recently killed himself because they wouldn’t just kill him. I have so much respect for inmates. Here are the people who merely follow their own biology, regardless of consequence, and they are hated and convicted for it. I relate to that so much, although I’ve never actually set out to harm anyone and am against such actions personally.

Kafka’s Trial and Orwell’s 1984 just stream through my head, and I think about how those books represwnt my own life. Condemned by biology to be ripped from non-existence into a paradoxical consciousness, where we’re told we’re free, but really we are imprisoned by our own emotions, capitalism, the very socialization we are raised with, and the confliction between anti-socialization and socialization. It all creates a tight, inescapable lock, in which the greatest prison of all is the one for those stupid, ignorant mother fuckers who don’t even notice that reality is a prison.

Society is just a bunch of atomitic tribes, Noam Chomsky would say that before nationally taught languages, there were different dialects, and even individual villages could not communicate with each other. That is why it’s retarded and silly that anyone is a nationalist. You belong to a tribe of millions of people you don’t even know, when if you break it down culture by culture by culture, down to the differen stereotypes which sit with each other at lunch, not even a single peraon could be said to have one exact group they fit in with perfectly? You have to be a pathetic moron to be a nationalist, one who doesn’t understand shit about how societies work.

We’re in a massive pyramid scheme. The top 10% own 84% of the wealth, the top 1% own 38% of the wealth, and it would take 4 planets for the third world to consume as much resources as the first world. Meanwhile every crash the economists, like preachers of olden days, simply say that there’s better times to come, they play the same role of spreading false hope.

Meanwhile moronic Leninists propose that to end this system, they must kill others like capitalists, police, the people who oppress them. Not realizing meanwhile, how they atomize themselves, inspite of their collectivist image. How can individualism ever succeed, when you must have everyone on the same page, or else they’re shunned? It’s no wonder they have so many purges in socialist countries, and there’s so little freedom.

Meanwhile, Dr Cornell West says global fascism is on the rise. And this is what the left is doing to combat it. Silly, facile bullshiy. And yet they think they’re so cool and brave for going around punching people they disagree with. Fuck revolutionary leftists, they’re terrorists, and fiends. George Orwell was right to turn them into the state, they’re scoundrels and they not only sympathize with, but advocate people like Lenin, and sympathize with the Soviet Union.

The left is just as culpable. Go to a leftist server, and they will say that everyone needs to be on the same page. I was recently banned from a leftist server for saying I don’t agree with violence. I agree with intersectional feminism, and I agree that capitalism must fall, but when they said that “here is a list of things our server stands for” which had somethings I agree with or disagree with, I pointed out the things I agree with, and they told me “here are the other things you need to agree with.” I responded with “okay” and they said “okay”?. I said yeah, I agree with leftism. They said “that’s not enough”. I said, okay, what specifically would you like me to agree with? And they banned me. Fucking terrorists. Fuck leftists, they’re disgusting, sectarian, piece of shit cunts. They’re so grotesque in their elitism and their Orwellian thought policing.

I do not agree with state socialism, I think in order for socialism to succeed it would need to be enacted through worker co-ops over time. I agree that we shouldn’t give fascists a platform, as in we don’t need to be obligated to invite them places, but we also shouldn’t give big social media conglomorates, like youtube and facebook, the power to censor. Private media is concentrated into the hands of tech giants and corporate news media gatekeepers. The window of acceptable speech narrows, all in tge name of maintaining an ultra sectarian view of what is acceptable, without having the Socratic dialog with others necessary to reveal underlying beliefs and convictions. Instead, we’re left with a circus, a massive tribal spectacle, of Roman inflection.

Fuck society. We are prisoners, tribal apes, slaves, ignorant and belligerent. All human beings, except those who have committed a wrong, deserve scorn. It’s the ones who perpetuate “perfection”, and Orwellian contradiction, which deserve to be dunked into a vat of shit, and covered in feathers. Fuck every person in this grotesque society.

DETERMINISTIC THEORY OF INTERSECTIONAL FEMINISM

The concept of free will is not compatable with intersectional feminism. The concept of free will upholds the concept of tabula rosa, which is the idea that each person is a blank slate, and ones behavior is determined by value decisions. Determinism is the concept that people are do not have total agency over their behavior. Society and biology both act consequentially in determining people’s behavior, in ways that people cannot control. In this essay, I would like to explain how society harms people by applying the concept of free will to others.

The biology of neuroatypical people is bludgeoned by Applied Behavioral Therapy (ABA), and neuronormativity in general. ABA is the idea that certain behaviors for autistic children, like stimming (which can manifest itself in behaviors like hand flapping, rocking back and forth, or doing whatever provides stimulation), or natural behavior such as avoiding eye contact, etc. should be suppressed in favor of neuronormative behaviors. This creates brain damage in autistic people by giving them internalized hatred, over their perceived “flawed behavior.”

This is how cultural factors effectively brain damage neuroatypical children, and adults, by making them feel as though behaving neuronormatively is simply a matter of valuing “normal behavior,” which is what ABA and neuronormativity instill in people; the idea that they are “not normal,” - not allow them to use stimming which is a natural coping mechanism for calming themselves - forcing them into stressful situations. This concept of “normal behavior,” is one based on the idea behaving neuronormatively is a matter of values, not biology.

Emotional issues arise as a result enforcing normative behavior in neuroatypical people. Internalized self hatred is an event which manifests itself in self hatred over a perceived inability to follow neurotypical standards of behavior. This can apply when forcing neurotypical people into many difficult settings.

Forcing people to behave according to gender norms bludgeons the brains of gender-non-normative people. Biology, as we know, does not determine gender. We know that gender it is only a set of norms which society constructs, and one does not “choose” to care for one set of norms or another. For example. Say a young AMAB child likes what society deems feminine, dresses, etc. They have a biological attraction to whatever object it is that they feel drawn to. (And vice versa; AFABs, intersex, apply as well).

Cultural factors effectively brain damage gender-non-normative children which are told to stop, just as they effect neuroatypical children. Telling a gender-non-conforming person that they are “wrong” to perform these behaviors, creates brain damage in gender-non-normative people by giving them internalized hatred, over their perceived “flawed behavior. The idea that forcing one to conform to the socially constructed concept of "man or woman,” is to operate on the idea that people can shape their behavior solely through values.

Deterministic factors create institutionally oppressive behavior, such as white supremacy, ableism, patriarchy, classism, etc. are perpetuated by instilling phobias and biases in people. The fear response is much higher in conservatives, those most likely to uphold traditional values. Conservatives have a much higher response to fear and disgust in their amgydala. Cultural factors effect the biology of gender-normative, white, straight people.

Cultural factors inform the biology of gender-normatives males. When a gender-normative male is taught that being feminine is shameful, this creates insecurity inside that person’s head. Being perceived as feminine creates a biological feeling of shame when the male is taught that femininity is shameful. That male could feel threatened and afraid of other gender-non-normative people acting feminine, which is why cis people often behave violently or derisively towards gender-non-normative people. This perception of femininity being bad, while inversely, masculinity is favorable, may be called “toxic masculinity.” It is a result of cultural factors determining biological phenomena.

Toxic masculinity may also manifest itself in a higher suicide rate among men. Men are less likely to express their feelings or seek help, due to the fear of being perceived as feminine. This fear manifests itself in not addressing emotional issues. It may also cause men to turn to violence to express feelings, because expressing feelings through words may be difficult.

Cultural factors inform the biology of white supremacy. In white people, white supremacy creates a phobia of being an “inferior race,” which creates the feeling in them that they are “proud” to be white, something they did not have a choice over. The reason they feel proud to be white, is because biologically, they have an internalized phobia of being inferior. Much like the internalized phobia of neurotypical people, neuroatypical people, gender-normative people, and gender-non-normative people. This can also cause white supremacists to act violently against POC.

Cultural attitudes also inform unconscious racial bias. The stereotypes about POC creates an unconscious fear inside the heads of white people, and even in POC of themselves, where an unconscious fear is created of these things. Tim Wise calls this phenomena “unconscious racial bias”.

Cultural attitudes inform prejudice against neuro-atypical people. Because non-normative behavior is seen as wrong, this creates a negative feeling attached to being perceived as neuro-atypical. Because of this fear, people deride neuro-atypical people by using words like autism as an insult. This fear of being perceived as abnormal creates a biological phobia inside the heads of neuro-typical people, which upholds ableism and allows neuro-typical people to condemn each other, because no person actually behaves completely typical 100% of the time. Just as no man behaves completely masculine 100% of the time.

(This is not to say all neurotypical people should be treated like autistic people, or that all men should be treated femininely. Only that environments of of acceptance, where we are not taught that being feminine is shameful, or neuro-atypical behavior is shameful, or being a person of color is shameful. Only that our spaces should be re-examined for ways they can be more inclusive to all people, regardless of their ability, gender, or race. This is the current goal of intersectional feminism, however, the factor of determinism vs free will is scarecely mentioned, if ever.)

Deterministic, materialistic factors inform the ability of people to function, regardless of ability, under capitalism. Rich children have an easier time succeeding under capitalism, because of things like more time spent with parents to develop verbally, more paid activities conducive to personal growth such as summer camps, more nutrition required for brain development, more advantages given to rich children growing up in nepotistic job opportunities, and a higher ability to pay for college and not have to work while doing so. It is such that a highly motivated poor kid doesn’t fair as well than a highly unmotivated rich kid.

In this way, deterministic factors are not only mental. Culture is deterministic too. The interplay of the two creates a bind between biology and culture, which cannot be broken. When we fail to look at human beings as biologically determined, we fail to take into account the ways that these deterministic processes shape who we are, and our society. Patriarchy, white supremacy, ableism, sexism, are not only structures upheld on the idea that some people are inherently inferior or superior. It is not only a value judgment. It is a phenomena which expresses itself in conservativism - the manifestation of fear in the amygdala, which scientists are uncovering to be the source of conservative behavior.

In order to combat these phenomena, we need to, in essence, eliminate conservativism, because it harms and brain damages everything that it comes in contact with. We can do so by applying determinism to the theory of intersectional feminism.

Why my experience as a neuro atypical makes me feel that the left needs to stop being sanctimoneous asshats.

People are very ignorant and misunderstanding. I was just watching some videos on stimming, Applied Behavioral Analysis (and why it’s shit), and executive function from a youtube channel called “Amythest Schaber”. Watching these videos made me think about what shit heads people are to each other. 

All through school I was forced into the feeling that I had to look and act “normal”, but it never worked. Like, I was developing naturally my own way of stimming and dealing with things when I was a kid, and they instill in you from an early age that these things are really bad. I remember having this feeling of being mentally ill, so much that I would just act like a crazy person because that’s what I thought they expected of me.

I definitely have trouble with executive functioning. I remember in sailing camp, doing the same tasks that everyone else was doing was something that instructors and campers would shame me for not doing correctly. So everyone basically hated me while I was there, and so I ended up taking out my anger on others by being mean to them, because I hated how mean and unfair they were to me. My dad would say I’m lazy for not doing tasks like yard work, except doing tasks like that always made me very emotionally tired.

I was diagnosed with autism when I was really young, and I always hated the diagnosis, because all it ever meant to me that everyone was a bunch of assholes who saw me as “not normal”, and all they cared about was making me “act normal”.

Not to mention, if you have trouble with executive functioning, it’s a lot harder to do well in school. It’s a lot harder to do well in jobs. I developed this severe anxiety over “wrong” behavior" because I was always made to feel really ashamed for the way that I talk, or think, or act, or move. It’s like, this constant anxiety in my head that just tells me “you’re fucking stupid and worthless”.

I was really upset in school. I was put in small group classes with people who were either thugs, had emotional challenges, learning disabilities, or often combinations of all of these things. I was made to feel insane, ostracized from my peers, made fun of, rejected for being different.

There’s so many ways that we don’t understand human behavior as a society, and we so often completely neglect people’s needs, toss people aside, made them feel sick or damaged because of their inherent behaviors. Think of all the people in the criminal justice system. From broken homes, poor, abusive, neglectful families. And we perpetuate the pain and suffering through our ignorance as a society. Our society is so sick, it’s no wonder we have so many shootings every day in America.

My experience as a neuro atypical person makes me feel like we deal with “wrong” behavior in such a toxic way. People think that ostracizing isolated communities like right wingers, Nazis, Incels, etc, shaming them for the way that they deal with their problems, is somehow morally righteous and good. It’s not. So many people think “this group bad! me punchy! nazis no human beings, like me! I human, they no human! I righteous, me communist”. It doesn’t make you righteous.

What is normal? There’s no such thing. No behavior is “normal”, and we treat others like garbage in this society so much for what is not deemed “acceptable” behavior. I feel so sad for the way I have been treated as a neuro atypical person, and I feel bad for people who have been ostracized from groups because of it.

I’ve been banned from so many groups in my area. I was recently banned from my college socialist club btw. They came up to me once, told me I was being annoying and they would kick me. Then after some stuff I posted in their online chat room, they kicked me again, and told me I need to “learn social skills”. Never mind the fact that they fucking support Vladimir Lenin and advocate violence against fascists and capitalists.

I was also banned from the non-binary community at my local lgbt center, because they said that I was being “classist” because I said I hate manual labor. So when they told me to apologize I told them to fuck off and stop bothering me.

I honestly just hate people, and I’m sick of society. I hate the rituals, I hate the way people communicate, and I hate their values. Everyone is dealing with their own cognitive function. If you believe in free will, you’re saying that everyone has the ability to operate perfectly neuronormatively. That’s tacitly false. Fuck normativity, fuck social justice warriors.

Speech should be free because thoughts cannot be suppressed through censorship. Dadaism is the result of censorship of thoughts. Dadaism is the rebellion against rigid intellectualism. Dadaism is an absurd backlash against the absurdity of intellectualism. And this backlash can be violent, and it can manifest itself in harm towards others. When one expresses themselves in a way which is not concurrent to the reigning mode of thinking, it may be thought of by the majority as heretical. But Spinoza, who spoke out against the Church, and was called a heretic, was thought of as Dadaist. Reality is relative, intellect is only in the eye of the beholder. When one wishes to adopt the mode of the intellect, they negate the Dada. Art is dead, the main phrase of the Dadaists. The reaction against WWI. One cannot negate others thoughts as Dadaism, because Dadaism will be the inevitable reaction to intellectualism.

When looking at the universe, I like to call onto Spinoza, and the deterministic nature of physics. Spinoza was one philosopher who was a deterministic pantheist. He saw all of the universe as one interconnected entity, in which nothing can be uncaused, and nothing can be self caused. He saw love and hate as pieces of the whole, which was the universe itself. In the laws of physics, everything operates on the laws of physics, and in the laws of physics we can have clocks, understand relativity, and launch satalites to far reaches of space with the amazing accuracy of the mathamatical deterrminism of the universe.

When taking determinism into account, it becomes hard to see any human being as anything other than part of the whole, like Spinoza would say. To look at anything as a part, would be to negate the whole. To say anything could have ever been any other way, is to negate determinism. Some determinists say that the universe is a large clockwork, set into motion at the beginning of time. In this clockwork, we are all simply animals that evolved in the deterministic, mechanical processes of evolution. Every animal is merely a process of it’s biology, and no animal can be said to be good or bad. It is simply part of this process.

This is why I hold that hating arises through misunderstanding in all instances. I am a strong advocate of humanism, and compassion towards all individuals, because I see them all as my siblings. Carl Sagan would say that we are all stardust, and in that sense all humans, no matter who they are, are related to me. It is for this reason that even criminals deserve rehabilitative prisons, like the ones we see in Norway. Advocating hate towards humanity is to operate on the fundamental notion that human beings have agency. It is to say they are self caused. But they are part of the clockwork of universe, and every person is our sibling in the cosmos

Albert Einstein himself was a determinist, and apparently wrote poems about Spinoza.

Leftists getting mad about Louis CK’s joke about the parkland shooting, you hate free speech. You’re not “critiquing his art”, you’re mad that he said it in the first place. Comedians are allowed to say outrageous things, so you’d better get used to it, because we’re not going to fucking censor what he says. If you want to do that, go hang out with Tipper Gore, and censor some Dead Kennedies records. Try and get Ulysses banned from the United States again while you’re at it. Try to keep the gays from marching in the streets, try to keep people from burning the American flag. Antonin Scolia ruled in favor of burning the flag, because it’s constitutional.

Free speech isn’t set in stone. If enough people stop believing in free speech, like the left when they express outrage over things which offend them, then people can vote free speech away. You should be happy Louis CK can say offensive stuff with impunity, because if you don’t believe in free speech for those you disagree with most, you don’t believe in free speech at all.

This outrage culture is creating a divide in America. People are tired of political correctness. That’s why when Hillary and CNN said Trump was so offensive throughout the entire campaign, people saw that and said “fuck you” and voted him into office. I never supported Trump, but I think he resonated with people’s concerns about Jobs, he resonated with people’s hatred and distrust of the elites who snubbed them. Democrats snubbed people, Bill Clinton shipped jobs over seas with NAFTA, Hillary supports more bills like TTP which do the same thing. Wealth inequality is at an all time high, even after 8 years of Obama.

Political correctness is fake problem solving. When you try to shut people up, they don’t go away. When you shame them, you didn’t convince them. You just made them angrier, you just made a group of people who look at you as the enemy. That’s why when you hear people talk about feminists, they say that they’re mean and nasty, and people automatically assume if you’re a queer person you hate white people and straight cis men. People have a lot of right to feel that way, because a lot of the time it’s true. The left is an incredibly nasty, snarky, elitist bunch of jackasses who have a tendency to make things worse for themselves by acting sanctamoneous and superior.

So when you act outraged over this sort of thing, and try to create an Orwellian atmosphere where your feelings are the greatest precedent, and anyone who disagrees with you is a horrible monster, you’re just undermining the free speech which allowed you to gain all the civil liberties you hypocritically say you support, which were gained from the civil rights era, when free speech allowed people to speak out against oppression. That’s why the American Civil Liberties Union supports the KKK, the lgbt community, and anyone else whose speech comes under threat.

Respect differences in opinion, because not everyone who disagrees with you is a bad person. If someone says something hurtful, it may be because they legitimately feel threatened, or hurt themselves. If you want to show someone that you’re goal isn’t to hurt them more, you could try to bring them in, instead of push them away. Build bridges and create trust, instead of acting so elitist, hypocritical, and entitled and foolish enough to think you’re the arbitor, and gatekeeper of opinions. You’re not. Your speech could be taken away too.

So thank you Louis CK. Please be more offensive, because your ability to be offensive, and piss of whiny elitist prick leftists, is what makes this country great.

Does the collectivist mode of thinking necessitate tribal group dynamics, and Orwellian thought policing? I’ve noticed a difficulty with idealogs to address points being made, and communists routinely purport the necessity of killing people to get communism to work. I question whether communists have a lack of desire to address points people disagree with. Perhaps a lack of ability, I would assume. I believe that this is why people who are in a cult of ideology are not concerned with addressing logical the points of people who disagree with them.

This is what my philosophy teacher told me, when he said that it’s not unusual that people in a political organization would want everyone to be on the same page. My philosophy teacher would say politics requires everyone to be on the same page, while philosophy could potentially undermine beliefs, because it requires basic beliefs to be questioned. This is what he told me when I asked why socialist organizations are dogmatic. That’s why he prefers to hang out with philosophers and not political organizations.

This may also be a result of collectivism, which I don’t think non individualist thinkers can address. If you have a system based on collectivism, you need everyone to be on board with your ideology. You need everyone to agree with you, otherwise they are “heretics” to the religion you’ve constructed. This is why I prefer worker co-ops. They are still somewhat individualist, but they eliminate inequality.

I don’t think a truly collectivist ideology can succeed, because it would require authoritarianism to make it work every time, if it were on a large scale. This is why so many socialist experiments simply end up with people who don’t agree with the experiment being killed. This is why collectivism leads to so much evil.

The weird thing about capitalism, is that in a way it’s an individualist’s dream come true. It can’t be overthrown because the owner class protect it, it allows total freedom of expression, and it subsumes every counter revolution and turns it into a commodity. If it weren’t for all the inequality and environmental destruction, I would say capitalism is the most beautiful system ever invented. It’s not though, it’s pretty bad, it leads to wars, inequality, imperialism, and environmental destruction.

Anarcho Syndicalism maintains much of the same individualist structure of capitalism, while eliminating unjust hierarchies of oppression, and the need to endlessly grow, like capitalism, and it eliminates the forced collectivization of classical communism.